***** February 2012
*****
Our
Annual Dinner Meeting will be Thursday, 9 February 2012 at the Madeline Suites
on the campus of UNCW. Dinner will begin at 7:00PM. Contact Bruce Patterson
(910-794-8905) or Dan Geddie (910-799-5338) for additional details.
We invite and welcome
all people with an interest in Civil War history to attend a meeting of the
Cape Fear Civil War Round Table. The speakers for our programs are diverse in
their views, interpretations, and presentations.
***** February Program *****

John Michael Priest
Mike Priest, scholar, author,
teacher, and certified Civil War battlefield guide, will join us on February 9th
at the Madeline Suites on the UNCW campus. Mike’s presentation will be entitled
Into the Fight, Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg.
Mike provided the following summary of his
presentation:
I discovered while researching what I
thought was an easy book, that a considerable number of the Confederates, for
whatever reason, other than being wounded, decided that "discretion was
the better part of valor." I also could not verify the horrendous
casualties they allegedly suffered after conducting a study of the nominal list
of casualties for all the regiments but those from Tennessee and Arkansas.
For years, I wondered if I would have crossed that field knowing full well what
lay ahead. The story of the charge has been distorted by myth. The
tactical presentation you will receive will put to rest the history we have
been taught.

Into the Fight
Mike
was born in Georgetown, DC. He received a B.A. in History and Secondary
Education from Loyola College (Baltimore) and a M.A. in Social Sciences from
Hood College (Frederick. Maryland). Mike taught World History, Government, U.S.
History, Civil War History, and Psychology for the Washington County Board of
Education from 1980 – 2011. The author and editor of many Civil War books and
articles, he received a Maryland Council for the Social Services Program
Excellence Award for his involvement with motivating and inspiring his students
to research, edit, and publish several books. In addition to sixteen books and
numerous articles in The Civil War Times
Illustrated, North & South, and the Potomac
Magazine, Mike has served as historical consultant to several television
and movie producers. In his spare time, he has conducted walking tours of
Antietam, the Wilderness, South Mountain, and Gettysburg. In 2011, Mike became
a licensed tour guide at the Antietam National Battlefield.
Mike listed his hobbies as Irish Folk
music, black powder shooting, writing, and giving tours.
Please join us on 9th February
for dinner with an accomplished historian who will share his research and
thoughts about one of the most dramatic events of the Civil War.
Editor
***** Raffle Winners *****
Raffle Master: Ed Gibson
If you
have books, prints, or other items that you would like to donate to the CFCWRT
raffle, talk to Ed at our next meeting.
January
Meeting:
Civil War Calendar - Dave
Paul
Quantrill in Texas - Tim Barton
Charles Dahlgren of Natchez - Bob
Cooke
Complete
Civil War Road Trip Guide - Palmer Royal
Lee
Takes Command - Tom Morgan
Ulysses
S. Grant - Tim Barton
***** Trivia Questions
February 2012 *****
1 – Who was
this officer? Another Opportunity to win a free
dinner reservation at the February 9th Dinner Meeting!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2– On July 3, 1863, a Confederate Brigadier General in
Pickett’s Division determined to show his courage in the face of his enemies.
This general, unable to walk because of an earlier injury, mounted his horse
and went forward to his death and disappearance from his comrades. Who was this
officer and what prompted him to seek a “glorious” end?
3 – Keith Hardison shared the story of Jefferson Davis’s
1825 carousing incident at Benny Havens’ Tavern while he attended West Point
(See Trivia question #4, January issue of The
Runner for additional details). According to Hardison, who may have
intervened to prevent Davis’s dismissal from West Point? What incident did
Davis become embroiled in during the Christmas season of 1826?
4 – Jefferson Davis
served as Secretary of War in the administration of Franklin Pierce 1853 -1857.
Keith Hardison outlined the many accomplishments that Davis oversaw while in
this office. What was one of the most unusual experiments that Davis
implemented?
5 - Throughout his life, Jefferson Davis failed to embrace the art of
compromise. What did Varina Davis say about her husband’s stubbornness?
6 – Jefferson Davis
and Abraham Lincoln shared many experiences as commander-in-chiefs. They also
shared a similarity as parents during their stay in their separate White
Houses. What was that parental similarity?
***** Member News
*****
If you
have member news that you think would be of interest to CFCWRT membership, let
me know about it.
1 – Welcome new member, Connie Hendrix, to the Cape Fear Civil War Round Table. We hope you
enjoy the programs and fellowship.
2 – Time is running out!! Still time to make your
reservations for the February 9, 2012
dinner meeting. John Michael Priest
will make a presentation entitled Into
the Fight, Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg. The dinner will cost $26 per
person and will be held at the Madeline Suite at UNCW. Contact Bruce Patterson (910-794-8905) or Dan Geddie (910-799-5338) via email or
telephone for further details.
***** Museum of the
Confederacy *****
<
>
CFCWRT members at
Pamplin Park
On January 18th, Lance Bevins, Dan Geddie, John Munroe, Dale
Lear, and Tim Winstead headed
north for a visit to the Petersburg and Richmond areas of Virginia. On
Wednesday, they toured the Blandford Church and the Petersburg National
Battlefield. The church was located at the Blandford Cemetery and each of its Tiffany
windows honored the war dead of a southern state. The battlefield sites
included the Crater, Fort Stedman, and other scenes of the nine month long
siege that strangled the Confederacy.

Blandford Church’s
Tiffany Window
Honoring South
Carolina’s Soldiers
January 19th was the
anniversary of the birth of Robert E. Lee. The group was privileged to enter
the vault and research room at the Museum of the Confederacy in Richmond.
Robert E. Lee’s sword and uniform, Wade Hampton’s cavalry sword, and Joe
Wheeler’s pistol were a few of the numerous items they were shown. The Research
Librarian shared a few of the items that had been saved by the ladies who
started the MOC. Lee’s General Orders No. 9 was, as it had been on April 10,
1865, emotionally moving and remarkable. “After four years of arduous service,
marked by unsurpassed courage and fortitude………….” The MOC was remarkable, not
just for the collection of artifacts of the famous, but for the artifacts and
records of the lower level officers and regular soldiers.
The 20th found the group at
Pamplin Park and the site of the April 2, 1865 breakthrough by Union forces
that led to the Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. NOTE: Wilson Greene, executive
director at Pamplin Park, will speak about the breakthrough to the Brunswick Civil War Round Table on
February 13, 2012 at Trinity UMC is Southport at 6:30.
***** February 1862
*****
February
1862 did not witness a massed Unionist attack on Richmond despite the orders of
Lincoln. However, a major Confederate fort was captured by Grant's men - a move
that boosted morale in the capital.
February
1st: Confederate generals became aware that Union forces were massing along the
line of the Mississippi River and planned to expect a major Union offensive
with the targets thought to be either Fort Henry or Fort Donelson.
February
2nd: Confederate intelligence indicated that the Union’s ability to move its
men along river systems was not good. However, the Confederates were unaware of
Lincoln’s order – to attack regardless.
February
3rd: Lincoln again asked McClellan to make a major move for Richmond using the
Army of the Potomac. McClellan again showed his usual reluctance to do anything
without having it precisely mapped out first. He told Lincoln that he wanted to
move troops by sea to the Virginia Peninsula and then push the 40 miles
inland.
February
5th: General Grant concentrated his forces for an attack on Fort Henry. He had
15,000 men under his command while the Confederate defenders at the fort
numbered 3,200.
February
6th: Union gunboats on the Tennessee River bombarded Fort Henry. The fort
commander, General Tilghman withdrew as many men as he could to Fort Donelson
but ensured that gunners remained in Fort Henry. By mid-afternoon the walls of
Fort Henry were broken and Tilghman decided to surrender. Only 63 men were left
in the fort. Over 3,000 made it to the relative safety of Fort Donelson, which
prepared itself for an attack. However, the control of the Tennessee River at
that point was very important to the Unionists as it allowed them to make river
patrols up to northern Alabama.
February
7th: Grant prepared for an attack on Fort Donelson, which was a far tougher
proposition than Fort Henry. Fort Henry was by the river’s edge while Fort
Donelson was 100 feet above the Cumberland River.
February
8th: Union forces took prisoner 2,527 Confederate troops at Roanoke Island,
North Carolina.
February
10th: Grant told his men that they would move on Fort Donelson within 24 hours.
The fort was 12 miles from Fort Henry. Grant’s large land force was bolstered
by a large river force as more Union gunboats joined the attack.
February
12th: 20,000 Union troops moved on Fort Donelson. By the time Grant’s men
arrived at the fort, it is thought that there were about 18,000 Confederate
troops in it.
February
13th: The attack on Fort Donelson started though the gunboats were late in
arriving. Artillery fire continued throughout the day and into the night.
February
14th: Six Union gunboats arrived at Fort Donelson. They accompanied ten
transport ships that brought an extra 10,000 Union troops to the fight. The
gunboats added an extra 70 guns to the Union’s artillery capability. As well as
being pounded from the land, the fort was attacked from the river. During the
night, the fort’s commander, General Floyd (John B.
Floyd, Buchanan’s Secretary of War), decided that the Confederate force
in the fort had to fight its way out and push into open land. Floyd assumed
that they had no chance of holding Fort Donelson.
February
15th: One hour before daybreak the Confederates in Fort Donelson attempted
their breakout. They had surprise on their side and attacked on just one front
but after initial success had to face Union troops sent to reinforce that
front. By the afternoon, the Confederates had to return to Fort Donelson. By
the end of the day, Fort Donelson was totally surrounded. Union troops
surrounded it on three sides on land and the Union gunboats dominated the
Cumberland River.
February 16th:
At dawn Fort Donelson surrendered. The Confederates had hoped to negotiate
terms but Grant told them that “unconditional and immediate surrender can
(only) be accepted”. The loss of Fort Donelson resulted in the Confederates
losing control of Tennessee and Kentucky. Over 14,000 Confederates were taken
prisoner.
February
18th: There was much celebration in Washington DC when news reached the capital
of the surrender of Fort Donelson. The First Congress of the Confederate States
of America met in Richmond.
February
21st: The Battle of Fort Craig in New Mexico was fought. This saw a Confederate
victory against a larger Union force. The Confederates captured six artillery
guns from the Unionists.
February
22nd: Jefferson Davis was inaugurated as the first President of the Confederate
States of America.
February
25th: General Halleck, commander of the Army of the Southwest, sent a series of
telegraph messages stating how well the Unionist forces were doing in Missouri
– a state seen as a thorn in the side to Federal aspirations. However, these
telegraph messages were misleading in that Halleck had yet to achieve anything
decisive.
February
27th: Davis was given permission by the Confederate Congress to suspend habeas
corpus if he felt it was necessary to do so. Davis asked for martial law to be
introduced at Norfolk and Portsmouth – both important naval bases in Virginia.
February
28th: Charleston was captured by Unionist forces. Charleston was to become the
capital for the new state of West Virginia.
Source:
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/february-1862-civil-war.htm,
accessed
December 23, 2011.
***** Through the
Blockade *****
“What possible chance
can the South now have?”
This is the third in a series of articles
that will examine the efforts of the United States and Confederate governments
to arm and equip the untrained mob of volunteers who flocked to their
respective banners. This article will focus on the Confederate Ordnance
Department and Massachusetts born, Major Caleb Huse, C.S.A. In April 1861,
Caleb Huse was ordered to proceed to Europe to undertake a mission for the
Ordnance Department. He was to travel, at considerable risk, through the North
to secure passage to England. The following from Huse’s book explained, in some
detail, the challenges that he faced as he made his way on his mission:
It was
impossible to get farther than Philadelphia that day. The next morning, on
taking my seat in the train, I recognized the gentleman directly behind me as
the Hon. Caleb Cushing. I did not accost him, not caring to meet acquaintances
just then, and, moreover, I had no reason to think that he knew me, for
although we were born in the same town,—Newburyport, Mass.,—he was a
distinguished public man when I was a boy.
The route
from Philadelphia to New York was by the way of Camden to South Amboy, and
thence by steamboat. The latter was a ferry boat with room for teams on each
side of the engine. There were no teams on board, and, as I had been sitting
for some time, and now that we were nearing New York where I was likely at any
moment to meet an acquaintance, I was a little nervous, I walked about the
lower deck. In doing so I met Mr. Cushing face to face. He was passing the time
in a similar manner. I lifted my cap, as I would to any superior officer, or
public man. Immediately Mr. Cushing stopped and said:
"Good
morning, Mr. Huse, you are with the South, I understand."
For the
moment I was staggered, but quickly calling to mind that Mr. Cushing had been
chairman of the Charleston Democratic Convention which nominated John C.
Breckenridge for President, I replied:
"Yes,
sir, what chance do you think the South has?"
"What
chance can it have?" he said, "the money is all in the North; the
manufactories are all in the North; the ships are all in the North; the arms
and arsenals are all in the North; the arsenals of Europe are within ten days
of New York, and they will be open to the United States Government, and closed
to the South; and the Southern ports will be blockaded.
What possible chance can the South have?" There was nothing for me to say
in reply, and I probably did the best I could have done under the
circumstances. Looking him squarely in the eye, I lifted my cap and said:
"Good morning, Mr. Cushing." I never saw him afterwards.
Huse may have been staggered by his encounter
with the Massachusetts politician, Caleb Cushing, but he was not deterred from
his task. NOTE: Caleb Cushing was President Franklin Pierce’s Attorney General.
He was known as a “doughface” for his southern sympathies; however, Cushing
supported the Union during the Civil War.
Upon his arrival in England, Huse quickly
went to the London Armory Company to fulfill his orders to procure 12,000
rifles and a battery of field artillery. In a strange scene, Huse found an
American engineer who had recently installed a plant of gun-stocking machinery
from the Ames Manufacturing Company of Chicopee, Massachusetts. Huse asked the
engineer if he was an agent of the United States Government whose presence was
to purchase arms. Huse informed the man that his intention was to secure arms
for the Confederate government and that he intended to fulfill his mission.
Huse felt that the engineer was indeed an U.S. agent and that he was there to
lock up the production the London Armory. Huse waited for the engineer to
complete his business and depart. Afterwards, Huse approached the
superintendent and the chairman of the company and asked the price of all the
arms that London Armory could produce in the coming year. Unable to respond to
Huse’s request of a price quote on such short notice, the chairman asked Huse
to return to his offices on the following day.
The chairman told Huse that the company
directors felt the output of the company should go to their current customers.
Without the ability to consult with the Confederate Government in Montgomery,
Huse determined to offer the London Armory a substantial profit to shake their
resolve to commit their production to the U.S. agent. By dangling profit and
the prospect of a renewed contract, Huse convinced the chairman that a solid
business arrangement was possible after the company fulfilled the relatively
small order for the U.S. Government. At the time of these negotiations, Caleb
Huse had no authorization for his proposal nor did he have at his disposal the
funds to complete the transaction. By his rash actions, Huse proved Caleb
Cushing’s prophesy as false – the South had indeed the ability to secure arms
for its armies regardless of the seemingly insurmountable advantages of the
North.
In his book, Huse outlined the reasons for
his successful efforts. Caleb Huse proved to be a resourceful and confident
officer. After the passage of many years, Huse detailed the reasons he thought
of himself as being able to achieve results and to compete with the U.S. Government.
Huse made no mention of the mission that Edward Clifford Anderson undertook to
ascertain Huse’s loyalty to the Confederate cause. (The Runner December 2011 issue, “Through the Blockade.”)
Baring Brothers were, at that time, the London financial agents
for the United States Government, and they would unquestionably have been
supported and gratefully thanked, had they assumed the responsibility of
contracting for all the arms in sight in England. Any army officer, fit for
such a mission as that of buying arms for a great Government at the outbreak of
a war, would have acted, if necessary, without instructions, and secured
everything that he could find in the line of essentials, especially arms, of
which there were very few in the market. There were muskets enough to be had for almost any
reasonable offer, but of modern Enfield or Springfield rifles—which were
practically the same—there were only a few thousand in England, and none
elsewhere except in Austria, where all were owned by the Government. And,
according to Mr. Cushing, these would be available by the United States but
impossible of purchase by "the South." Yet even so high an authority
as Ex-Attorney General Cushing proved to be wrong in his assumption, as will be
shown below.
Any young, intelligent West Point graduate holding an army
commission and as fearless in assuming responsibility as the average
"graduate," would not only have prevented my making this important
contract, but would have blocked my efforts in every direction; for in all
Europe the supply of arms ready for use or possible of manufacture was very
limited. Such an officer would have secured everything worth having—in other
words, all the best—and only inferior arms of antiquated
model would have been left for the Confederacy. The effect would have been not
only to give the United States good arms in profusion, but utterly to
discourage their opponents by the inferiority of their weapons.
Mr. Davis did not make the great mistake of sending a civil agent
to purchase supplies—a duty as thoroughly military as any that could be
named—nor the still greater blunder of setting several men to do what one man,
with uncontrolled authority, could do so much better. Doubtless he could have
found men who would have performed the duty as well as did the young officer
whom he selected, and some who would have done their part better; but, during
the whole war, no change was made, although not to remove him often required that
firmness—not to say obstinacy—which was a prominent trait of Mr. Davis's
character, and which, right or wrong, but especially when he was right, he
exercised to a remarkable degree.
Through the Blockade will continue in the next issue.
Source:
Caleb Huse, The Supplies for the
Confederate Army: How They Were Obtained in Europe and How Paid For: Personal
Reminiscences and Unpublished History [Boston: Press of T.R. Martin &
Son, 1904] 5-36.
Editor
*****
January Meeting *****
Jefferson Davis
“Confederate Commander”
The
members and guests who attended the January 12th meeting were
fortunate to enjoy the presentation by one of Jefferson Davis’s most
knowledgeable scholars, Keith Hardison.
Keith’s experiences from 1986 - 1999 as executive director at Beauvoir, Confederate President
Jefferson Davis’s home and library, were evident in the depth and insight
provided during his presentation. However you personally view Jefferson Davis,
Hardison presented a detailed look at the man, his talents, his
accomplishments, and his failings.

Keith Hardison –
Director of the Division of State Historic Sites and Properties
Keith’s discussion focused on Davis’s
qualifications to be the Confederate President and Commander-in-Chief. His
brief comparison between the qualifications of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson
Davis revealed a major difference in the experiences each man brought to their
respective offices. Davis ,by virtue of this training at West Point (1824
-1828), his service in the U.S. Army from 18828 – 1835, his success as the
colonel of the Mississippi Rifles during the war with Mexico 1846 -1847, and
his service as Secretary of War in Franklin Pierce’s administration, was experienced
in many matters of the military sciences. While Davis had been a reluctant West
Point cadet and subject to dismal for several infractions, his service in the
US Army both in the western territories and his volunteer service during the
Mexican War were more than adequate. While both Lincoln and Davis were to
endure an awesome burden as Commander-in-Chiefs, Davis was the man whose résumé reflected
considerable talents.
Why then, if Davis was so qualified for
his position, did he fail? Keith provided a listing of factors, some
controllable and others not, that weighted into Davis’s shortcomings.
Situational factors (uncontrollable):
-
The geographic size and
character of the Confederacy was simply too large for the resources (men and
materials) available to the Confederacy to effectively manage.
-
Davis was faced with building a national
government at the same time the Confederacy was fighting for its survival.
-
The infrastructure,
manufacturing capacity, and capital resources available to the south were
insufficient for the needs.
-
States Rights, which Davis supported on many occasions
before the war, were too divisive to allow centralization of power to a
national government. Keith related an example that reflected the problem of
appeasing the sensitivities of each individual state. The first three
Secretaries of War, each of whom served for short intervals and with mixed
results, were all lawyers with little or no military experiences. Jefferson
Davis’s personal choice for Secretary of War had been Braxton Bragg. Davis,
because of the need to placate the various states, had selected less able men –
an Alabama secessionist lawyer, a Louisiana lawyer and wealthy planter, and a
Virginian lawyer who grandfather had been Thomas Jefferson. For all his
shortcomings and inability to get along with almost anyone, Braxton Bragg was
an effective organizer and planner with an understanding of what an army needed
to give battle.
-
The strategy of the Confederate
government was limited to the defense of many sites within the country. The
Confederate Army did launch invasions of the north; however, the need to defend
so many locations prevented the commitment of sufficient forces to successfully
take the war to their enemies. NOTE: Early in the conflict, Davis had said that
the Confederacy just wanted to be left alone.
Personal factors (controllable):
-
Davis was extremely
loyal to his friends and hostile toward to those he disliked.
n
Davis supported Bragg when
others called for Bragg’s dismal as an army commander. After Bragg had failed
in many duties, Davis sent Bragg to command in Wilmington in late 1864. (“Hello
Bragg, goodbye Wilmington.”)
n
Davis disliked Joe
Johnston, P.T.A. Beauregard, D.H. Hill, and others, Sometimes his animosity
clouded his judgment – Hood to replace Johnston at the gates of Atlanta,
-
Davis had military
experience but he had never commanded an army. He did; however, consider
himself to be extremely knowledgeable about all military matters.
-
Davis was a workaholic
who immersed himself in minutiae that could and should have been delegated to
subordinates.
Hardison’s conclusion about the role
Jefferson Davis played as commander-in-chief: His qualifications and skills
were considerable; however, his personal failings overshadowed his talents.
Considering the challenges faced by Davis, Hardison did maintain that few, if
any man, could have done more to sustain the Confederacy through four years of
war.
*****
Comments and Suggestions *****
Comments
and suggestions to make the Cape Fear Civil War Round Table and “The Runner”
more relevant to your Civil War experience are welcomed. Send them to me at tpwinstead@gmail.com. Please include “CFCWRT News” in your Subject
line.
***** Trivia Question
Answers December 2011 *****
1 - Who was this officer? Another chance to win, but this is your last chance. The first one who tells me who this man was wins a reservation to the February Dinner Meeting. This is a $26 value for the inquisitive individual among you who can correctly answer this trivia question. If you need additional hints about this man’s identity (other than he is a Confederate with a semi-Napoleonic pose and he commanded Neverson Columbus Winstead late in the war, send me an e-mail tpwinstead@gmail.com). Hint#1: This officer was a West Point cadet who resigned to serve his southern state.
2 - On July 3,
1863, a Confederate Brigadier General in Pickett’s Division determined to show
his courage in the face of his enemies. This general, unable to walk because of
an earlier injury, mounted his horse and went forward to his death and
disappearance from his comrades. Who was this officer and what prompted him to
seek a “glorious” end? Richard
B. Garnett, an 1841 West Point
graduate, had run afoul of Stonewall Jackson for his alleged actions at the
Battle of Kernstown on March 23, 1862. Jackson had Garnett arrested for an
unauthorized retreat (per Garnett, only after his men ran low on ammunition
while fighting a superior Union force). Jackson proposed to court-martial
Garnett; however, Robert E. Lee reassigned Garnett to Pickett’s former brigade.
Garnett spent the next year trying to prove his bravery; on July 3rd,
he paid the ultimate price. To remove the stain against his name, Garnett,
having been previously kicked by his horse, rode his black charged forward into
the hell that became known as “Pickett’s Charge”. Garnett’s body was never
recovered from the battlefield.
In one of those ironies that
seemed to appear throughout Civil War history, Garnett served as a pallbearer
at Stonewall Jackson’s funeral after Jackson’s death from wounds received at
Chancellorsville.
Approximately thirty years
after the Gettysburg battle, General George H. “Maryland” Steuart found
Garnett’s engraved sword in a Baltimore pawnshop. The sword was an artillery
officer’s pattern and had “R.B. Garnett, U.S.A.” engraved on the blade. Steuart purchased it and evidentially
returned the relic to Garnett’s family. Today, Richard Garnett’s sword is
included in the collection of the Museum of the Confederacy in Richmond,
Virginia.
Source: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Garnett_Richard_B_1817-1863,
accessed December 25, 2011. http://www.gdg.org/Research/SHSP/shgarnet.html,
accessed December 25, 2011.
3 - Keith Hardison shared the story of
Jefferson Davis’s 1825 carousing incident at Benny Havens’ Tavern while he
attended West Point (See Trivia question #4, January issue of The Runner for additional details).
According to Hardison, who may have intervened to prevent Davis’s dismissal
from West Point? What incident did Davis become embroiled in during the
Christmas season of 1826? John
C. Calhoun was Secretary of War when Jefferson Davis was appointed to West
Point. Calhoun also aided the young cadet by perhaps preventing Davis’s
dismissal for the Benny Havens’ incident. Davis was also linked to the
Christmas Eve 1826 “Eggnog Riot” (See http://www.army.mil/article/49823/The_Eggnog_Riot/
for additional information.)
4 - Jefferson Davis served as Secretary of War in the administration of
Franklin Pierce 1853 -1857. Keith Hardison outlined the many accomplishments
that Davis oversaw while in this office. What was one of the most unusual
experiments that Davis implemented? The U.S. Army Camel Corps (its 77 camels, and chief camel driver, Hadji
Ali) was the subject of much interest in the barren west prior to the Civil
War. The tensions of the gathering sectional discord prevented Congress from
following recommendations to increase the camel corps and continue the
experiment.
5 - Throughout his life, Jefferson Davis failed to embrace the art of
compromise. What did Varina Davis say about her husband’s stubbornness? Varina Davis
supposedly remarked that her husband. “did not know the arts of the politician
and would not practice them if understood.”
Source: http://www.aboutfamouspeople.com/article1031.html
accessed January 16, 2012.
6 – Jefferson Davis
and Abraham Lincoln shared many experiences as commander-in-chiefs. They also
shared a similarity as parents during their stay in their separate White
Houses. What was that parental similarity? Both Davis and Lincoln experienced the death of a
son while they served their nations.
|
|